4-29-05 USGBC Cogeneration Presentation
LEED : USGBC Cogeneration Presntation.
My notes on the talk by Richard Holzer & Jack Rosenthal (Glumac), Orange County Chapter of the United States Green Building Council, USGBC meeting, 4/29/05.
Richard Holzer only spent a brief few minutes bragging about his company, Glumac. He gave some numbers and examples of the LEED projects that the firm has done, and claimed credit for the "first LEED building on the west coast". He stated that the company had 47 LEED Accredited professionals, 6 of which were in Irvine. The Glumac note cards, passed out for participants to jot questions on, were lined with lime green highlights and printed with the catch phrase "Glumac. Engineers for a sustainable future".
Very quickly, however, Holzer acknowledged that when doing cogeneration projects, Glumac nearly always favors a turnkey process of design build participation. Glumac, as the project engineer, sets the parameters for a cogeneration plant design which is furnished by a company called Northern Power (www.northernpower.com) who designs and provides inner workings of the cogeneration plant, its controls, and connections. According to Holzer, engineers attempting to take on cogeneration projects in a traditional design - bid - build manner face an impractically difficult challenge. There is a tremendous time investment in the design of these systems.
Holzer turned the floor over to Jack Rosenthal, the main presenter. Rosenthal's presentation included a good deal of sales type information on cogeneration systems. It was speckled with useful facts and figures and concepts, and some outright selling propaganda. (Cogeneration sales presentations often lean on the idea of 80 - 90% efficency, a level of excellence achievable only under optimum conditions.) When selling cogeneration, common talking points are: high electricity rates, volatility of electricity rates, reliability of the electrical utility, "rolling blackouts", and the "split" between gas rates and electricity rates on a common unit basis. The ideal customer for cogeneration would have 24/7 operations, a high cost of outages, and a constant need for heat and power.
Some key concepts presented were as follows: Distributed generation is when power is generated in small or on-site power generation stations, as opposed to centralized generation by power plants. Distributed generation ties into the local power grid. Self Generation is a generation station for a purpose that does not tie in to the local grid. Selling back to the grid is when a distributed generation station produces more power than it has a demand for on site, and sells power to the local utility. This is generally a bad deal for the owner who has to get rid of his excess power at whatever price the utility offers. If the system is to be tied into the local grid, sophisticated controls must comply to the utility requirements to avoid any risk to the grid. Distributed generation plants may utilize a variety of energy generation equipment including Combustion turbines, reciprocating engines, photovoltaic cells, fuel cells, or microturbines. Microturbines are of particular interest because of the efficieicys available when the waste heat can be re-used. Other equipment used in cogeneration include heat exchangers, silencers, absorptive chillers, cooling towers, and controls.
An important distinction should be made between distributed generation facilities and emergency generators. Since distributed generation stations are designed to run consistently, the air quality requirements are very different from emergency generators. In fact, air pollution and discharge concerns are a consistent issue in distributed generation plants. Catalytic converters are normally required to clean the stack discharge to meet emissions standards for engines as set by the local air quality management districts (AQMDs). AQMDs generally require that distributed generation stations meet the "Best Available Control Technologies" (BACT) to control emissions. Often, to achieve financial incentives from utility providers, plants will be required to exceed BACT. Also, since distributed generation stations are nearer to population, locating the stack discharge can be quite a challenge. Silencers will often be required for noise.
Conceptually, and in it's most simple form, the benefit of cogeneration is better usage of fuel. To produce, for example, 30 units of power and 70 units of heat, one could utilize a 55% efficient power plant and an 80% efficient boiler. That would take 150 units of input. Alternately, one could utilize a cogeneration system to produce 30 units of power and 70 units of waste heat from 110 units of input. The overall units of input are lower for the same useful energy.
However, cogeneration can take many forms. Any two or more types of power generation that can be coupled into a single point of production is an opportunity for cogeneration. Compressors, air compressors, or pumps, for example, can be coupled to the microturbine shafts to produce more than one form of useful energy. the many forms of cogeneration have many different operating efficiencies. A waste heat recovery microturbine, as described above, can offer source energy efficiencies up to 80 or 90%. Less direct cogeneration methods, such as absorptive chillers, will be less efficient, but may make economic sense.
Cogeneration systems are installed based on the economic benefit of doing so. The first and last task in cogeneration application is an economic analysis of the initial cost, estimated or forecast energy rates, and operating cost savings over time, and return on initial investment. Cogeneration systems require a significant first cost capital investment. The magnitude of this first cost ranges from $1800/kw for an IC engine with heat recovery to $3000/kw for microturbines. In one hotel resort case study, the layout of the site made cogeneration unattractive due to pumping energy to get the waste heat where it was needed. Cogeneration works best where there is a constant and centralized need for power and heat. Another case study was a potato processing plant, where waste heat could always be used to heat water for the process.
Some utilities do offer financial incentives for distributed generation plants, as they do aid the utility shed load from the grid. In order to receive financial incentives from a utility, Rosenthal presented, cogeneration systems need to meet a set of criteria. Efficiencies must be 60% or better. BACT should be utilized to improve the emissions over AQMD requirements.
The heat and focus of the economic analysis is what Rosenthal called the "spark spread", the difference in cost of producing energy via the cogeneration plant and buying energy from the utilities. From this, the returns on capital investment are determined. The spark spread, however, is tied to energy rates, both present and future. So, Rosenthal spent a little bit of time talking about energy rate forecasting, quoting the oil futures markets, the California Energy Commission (CEC) forecasts, and some older forecasts from the 1970s in which he was personally involved.
Rosenthal and Holzer fielded questions after the presentation. Attendants asked about first cost and reliability. I posed my long-standing question as best I could. From an air pollution only standpoint, are distributed systems worse than centralized generation? Rosenthal answered by talking about how a large portion of California's power is produced outside the state.
Travis 4/29/05
P.S. - From my slanted, leftist, environmental communist surfer perspective, I have doubts. The economic basis of decision for cogeneration is great for the owner's economics, but I question that it necessarily translates to green benefits. There is an assumption that if power is more cost effective, it is better for the environment, and greener. That has not been proven to me. I suspect that there are market conditions where lower efficiency cogeneration systems (absorption chillers in office buildings) may be economically justified but not represent an actual improvement in fuel resource usage or air emissions over the state grid production. Cogeneration plants are not generally green power - water, solar wind or geothermal - while some of the state's grid is. And from a local pollution standpoint, which as a surfer is all I really care about, I suspect that these small plants in our communities are pumping the air full of nasty stuff for me to breathe, and then it washes into the ocean, helps the water stink, kills the fishes, bla, bla, bla.